November 11th, 2009

Gentle Readers, I have hit a snag. I’m supposed to be writing an article about good wholesome films for girls - you know, the kind you could watch at a 10-12-year-old’s sleepover and not have parents ringing up later wanting to know why little Maisie is gibbering in the closet or where Susan learned That Word. Nudity-free, decapitation-free, the cinematic equivalent of organic grass-fed pastured beef.

Trouble is, I can’t think of any.

So far I’ve got Singin’ in the Rain, The Sound of Music, Pollyanna and Anne of Green Gables - the sorts of films it takes a particular type of modern 12-year-old to stomach, and even then I’m a bit dubious about the cake scene in Singin’ in the Rain. So I thought of adding some more recent, snazzy fare. But nope. Ever After? Has a bad word. The Disney/Pixar films? Most 12-year-old girls would probably think they were too babyish (not being old enough to know better), and besides, they do tend to have a fair amount of violence and even suggestiveness in them. Plus, a lot of parents are anti-Disney. Then there’s The Princess Bride, but nope, bad word again; or Labyrinth, but nope, David Bowie’s trousers. In despair I went back to the oldies, but even the cheesiest musicals I could think of have distinctly dubious elements. I briefly considered The King and I, Oklahoma! and The Wizard of Oz (no good, magic and witches, somebody would be bound to object) before giving up and pounding out an article on media portrayals of fat people, about which I am currently disputing Suite101’s editor on whether it constitutes an opinion piece.

So. Thoughts? I am looking in the 10-12ish category, so no Beatrix Potter, however immaculate. Something fun, girly or less girly as you please, but no guns, in which all the characters are clad neck to knee and say “Oh bother” when disaster strikes. Anyone?

Tags: ,

This entry was posted on Wednesday, November 11th, 2009 at 4:40 pm and is filed under writing. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

12 Responses to “Things Kids Watch These Days”

Mother Says:

Jane Austen? Perhaps you should consult with your small sisters. What about that Kate Winslet/ EwenMcG thing on J.M. Barrie? Or was that Ever After? I forget.

Betty Scandretti Says:

There was a Christian film company that specialised in altering films to be like that. Digital corsets in Titanic, that kind of thing. Weedy in the extreme. Jane Austen is probably a goer, though, and what about similarly-pitched adaptations of Eliot and the Brontës and such? Not Anne, of course. If you’re thinking of relatively naif twelve-year-olds who aren’t going to pick up on anything too sly you should be able to pretty much go with the Hayes Code.

Roman Holiday doesn’t get much dodgier than “I plan to infiltrate her sickroom disguised as a thermometer”, does it?

smokering Says:

Mother: Miss Potter? I thought it was weedy myself. Then again, that need be no hindrance. Jolly good.

Lizzie: Hays, not Hayes. Again I have learned something new today. “The technique of murder must be presented in a way that will not inspire imitation” - laudable! Jane Austen is certainly a candidate, although doesn’t the BBC Pride and Prej contain the odd moment of well-bred English profanity? I’m not sure about the Brontes though. Which Brontes precisely? The ones with the bigamists and madwomen, or the voyeuristic semi-pedophilic professors, or the drunk and abusive husbands, or the grave-robbing? As for Eliot I’m not sure I’ve seen a film adaptation of her works, but if the books are anything to go by they wouldn’t be sizzling fare for a twelve-year-old slumber party. “There was, like, this fundy idealist and she married this old guy, who was a scholar, and he was like TOTALLY pedantic and crushed her ardent nature, it was so cool!”

Roman Holiday does have that kiss in the taxi. Pretty heady stuff. And there’s a cig, is there not?

You perceive this is a more difficult task than meets the eye.

Miriam Says:

Finding Neverland? Has subtle implications of infidelity and, of course, TB, but that may go over the heads of many 10 year olds.

Last time we watched Ever After with the small sisters, you may remember that unscripted yet perfectly timed concerted cough, which managed to obliterate said profanity with great aplomb - I don’t think they heard it at all.

The olde British version of Swallows and Amazons is smashing fare, good an’ wholesome.

I agree with the suggestion of Jane, but for gracious sake no Brontës. I caught glimpses of parts of both Jane Eyre and Wuthering Heights on TV at a similar age, and not only did it give me the Nightmares, but it put me off the literature for far too long. I only rediscovered them in my twenties…

AprilElf Says:

<i.Annie!

What young girl does not love Annie? But then, you have not seen it!!! Disgusting.
Oh, Miss Hannigan drinks gin and makes passes at the entire cast of male characters … :(

Also -
Edward Scissorhands (PG ‘violence’)
Peter Pan 2003 version (PG ‘violence’)
Little Lord Fauntleroy was a favourite of mine (Ricky Schroeder as a cute little kid, and Alec Guiness, I think!)
The Secret Garden …? Never seen it.
Ella Enchanted
Enchanted

Bad word in The Princess Bride? … I can’t think of it, and it’s going t-… oh, I just remembered it! :P

I’m probably going to be mocked for this, but I also used to like Return to Oz. Oh, but then I see you’ve said Wizard of Oz is no good. Harumph!

I think that’s an almost impossible assignment.

Miriam Says:

Gosh, but Edward Scissorhands is scary! I wouldn’t show that to a 10 year old girl if you paid me.

I agree with The Secret Garden, though - that is a good one.

AprilElf Says:

It’s really the parents you are catering to here, and anything they approve of is going to be soooo uncool in the eyes of the tweens. (They probably scare the living daylights out of each other, and hear plenty of bad words at school.)

Edward Scissorhands might be too much of an art film to be suitable anyway, never mind the scariness. Girls would probably get bored with the slow pace of it.

I’m sure I was also watching stuff like Oliver (musical) around the age of 10-12. Bill Sykes must’ve been worthy of a few nightmares!

smokering Says:

Edward Scissorhands has some not-entirely-decent…cy. I should watch it again though, I only saw it once and that was ages ago. I don’t think I found it scary at the time… Return to Oz, on the other hand - yikes! Those roller skates? I had nightmares for years before I twigged that they were out of that film and not just dreamt up by my crazy mind.

OK, so, thus far I’ve got:

Little Women
Anne of Green Gables
Pollyanna
The Sound of Music
Emma
Miss Potter
Swallows and Amazons
Little Lord Fauntleroy
Singin’ in the Rain

I’m debating Peter Pan. There is violence. And a skeleton here and there, I think. And, y’know, Tinkerbell trying to murder Wendy in a jealous rage. And the 2003 version is generally pretty Freudian and riddled with pre-teen angst.

April: It’s funny, I thought we were brought up pretty sheltered movie-wise, but when I look back at half the stuff we used to watch I couldn’t possibly approve it for the list! :p The King and I, for instance, is suspect on many levels. The moral of the story being that cheesy dance numbers and 2 1/2 hour running times are no proof against Vice.

Betty Scandretti Says:

That is true. Brigadoon?

There may have been a reason why we were raised on Chariots of Fire and Red River of Life alternately.

Mara Says:

What about The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants? Rated PG.

Mathew Says:

It’s a Wonderful Life

There are many films that I think are suitable for 12 year olds, but it starts to get a little hard when given such tight limitations.

Miriam Says:

Oooh, The Railway Children. Actually both versions (1970 and 2000) are good. And I still haven’t seen the recent adaptation of Ballet Shoes, but I believe that’s supposed to be not bad.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>